Affairs Valentino Book Critique: - A Work Of Fan Fiction? ***UPDATED****

UPDATE: 

After writing a stinging rebuke on the many errors and calling out the horiffic and outrageous "A Forewarning" in the front of the book. Affairs Valentino author responded by posting this on Twitter


             "I must have done a great job on Affairs Valentino..."
                                                                           - Evelyn Zumaya August 12, 2018


Un-believeable!!


Is Affairs Valentino fan fiction?  Reams of quotes and dialogue were created by the books author Evelyn Zumaya.  She does not source her quotes or where she has relayed what people were thinking in their minds back in the 1920's.  Yet, that doesn't stop the author from presenting fictional dialogue as true quotes.

As I have pointed out in a previous post she used "quotes" but admitting (later) that she faked the quote of Rudy on the dock.  In the true Ullman manuscript the quote was "I hope I never see him again"  In her book Affairs Valentino, Zumaya altered the quote to read  "I hope I never see the bastard again"  She used "quotes" in both books.  Serious red-flag here.

Now on page 457 of Affairs Valentino the author Evelyn Zumaya purports to tell us not only that Rudy was "dreaming" on his death bed, she EVEN TELLS US WHAT HE WAS DREAMING ABOUT!

  In the literary world this kind of writing is called fan fiction.

Valentino death bed "dream"
 in Affairs Valentino Page 457

She  claimed Rudy frolicked at the Marion Davis Beach house.  Wrong!  It was built 2 years after Valentino's passing.

She claimed the slave bracelet was welded to his wrist.  Wrong!  I proved that was not true.

She didnt know how to spell the name of the street he lived on.

She thought the Lasky Ranch was Jessie Lasky's personal ranch.

She bungled the Disneyland lawsuit by Jean Valentino

She got the time of day he died wrong!

She got the date wrong on the Valentino/Jean Acker divorce

She wrongly stated Rex Ingram was an "unknown" when directing the 4 Horseman

How many examples of errors will I have to post to prove the vast lack of Valentino knowledge of the author of Affairs Valentino.  The simplest of details are lost upon the author.

"The Infancy Of The Myth" Book Critique - Affairs Valentino Publisher

   My copy of "Infancy of the Myth"

The Infancy of the Myth is the title of a book that covers Rudolph Valentino's time in Castellaneta from birth until the family moved to Taranto a span of about nine years.  Written by Castellaneta historian, Aurelio Miccoli, often called "the professor"

The book is paperback and clocks in at 255 pages although Amazon lists the book in error at 294 pages.  It has many color photographs of vintage structures in Castellaneta, including churches and street-ways and of course Valentino's noted birth home.  To me the photographs were the best part of the book.  

The book is being marketed as a straight forward biography of Rudolph Valentino's first nine years of life.  On Amazon the publisher has tried to sweeten the deal by describing it as a "scholarly study" and says it is a "stunning, accurate narrative".  No, sadly, it is not even close to that wishful description the publisher, Viale Industria Publication put on Amazon.

If the book had been marketed as "historical fiction"  I would award the author ***** five stars on Amazon.  However as a "scholarly study" it comes up with * star.  

Why?  Fictional dialogue.  A whopping 90% of the book is fictional dialogue. 

                                    

This is an example where the author completely invents dialogue, actions, glances, touching.

Here the author tells the reader what Alberto and Rodolfo were thinking, as well as what their fathers actions were.  All fabricated.

Here the author tells us what Rodolfo was thinking and felt; pain, humiliation and anger.  All fabricated.

Here the author fabricates an entire interaction with the local priest along with back and forth fictional dialogue.  All untrue.

                          

 The author has provided no citations as to where he is pulling the dialogue from, and therefore there is no way for him to know from 1895 to 1904 as to what Valentino's mother, father, brother, priest was thinking, or saying.  Yet he tells us page after page of what they were thinking, he quotes them in casual dialogue.  

The premise of the book is true;  Castellaneta is the real town where Valentino was born and yes his father, Giovanni, his mother Gabrielle, his brother Alberto all were real people. The author in his introduction said his aim of the book was to outline the real events.  This he accomplished, but just reader be wary -  everything outside of that framework has been created out of thin air.   It reads like historical fiction and if that is fine by you, then by all means add this book to your library.   Just know that it is not a "scholarly study" nor is it a "stunning, accurate narrative" as the publisher has described.